Business Management

Bill Gates is retiring, sort of. He is still only 52, and he is going off to spend more time guiding the world’s richest philanthropy, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. He will still be Microsoft’s chairman and largest shareholder, but Friday is his last day as a full-time worker at the software giant, marking the unofficial end of his career as a business leader.
And what a career it has been. Gates has been an animating force behind the PC revolution, helping to build a huge global industry and engineer blockbuster products like Windows and Office, used every day in offices and homes around the world.
The Harvard dropout was the wealthiest person on the planet for years worth more than $100 billion in 1999 though his fortune is now about half that because of the decline of Microsoft’s shares and his continued donations to his foundation, which is focused on global health and education.
Despite his success, Gates is moving on as the company he co-founded in 1975 is struggling to find its way. The center of gravity in technology has shifted from PCs to
Net, altering the old rules
of competition that
were so lucratively
mastered by Microsoft.
For millions of users, cellphones are beginning to edge out PCs as the tool of choice for many computing tasks. And Google, the frontrunner in the current wave of internet computing, has wrested the mantle of h i g h - t e ch leadership from Microsoft.
A l - though Gates will spend one day a week at the company, it will be up to his successors, led by Steven A Ballmer, the chief executive, to master the challenges of the internet or watch Microsoft’s wealth and stature in the industry steadily erode. Bill’s legacy is Windows and Office, and that will be a rich franchise for years to come, but its not the future, said David B Yoffie, a professor at the Harvard Business School.
Still, the Gates legacy is impressive. In addition to software itself, Gates and his company have shaped how people think about competition in many industries where technology plays a central role. Today, there are more than one billion copies of Windows operating system on PCs around the world. Industry experts and economists say that Windows is not necessarily the best or most admired software for running the basic operations of a PC Apple’s Macintosh can claim the most devout fan club. But Gates grasped and deployed two related concepts on a scale no one ever had in the past: the power of network effects and the value of establishing a technology platform. Put simply, the network effect describes a phenomenon in which the value of a product goes up as more people use it. Email messaging and telephones are classic examples. A technology platform is a set of tools or services that others can use to build their own products or services. The more people who use the tools, the more popular the platform can become. Gates took advantage of both notions and combined them to build Microsoft’s dominance in PCs, spreading its influence with PC makers and software developers.
Today, there are many thousands of software applications that run on the Windows platform, not just word processing and spreadsheets but also specialized programs in doctors offices, factory floors and retail stores a broad network on a nearly ubiquitous technology platform. “Gates saw software as a separate market from hardware before anyone else, but his great insight was recognizing power of the network effects surrounding the software,” said Michael A Cusumano, a professor at the MIT’s Sloan School of Management. “That,” Professor Cusumano added, “was the essential difference in the paths of Microsoft and Apple, the early leader in personal computing.” Apple focused on making outstanding products alone, while Microsoft nurtured a growing ecosystem of outside software developers who use, and are dependent on, Microsoft’s technology”, he said. “The result,” he added, “is that, while Apple continues to make outstanding products, more than 90% of personal computers run Microsoft software.” In the early years, it was unclear how much Gates was pursuing each opportunity as it came, as opposed to carrying out a grand strategy. “He certainly had large ambitions. When he was a Harvard undergraduate, Gates lamented that so many of his fellow students pursued a narrow track for success instead of being willing to take big risks to do big things,” recalled Michael Katz, a Harvard contemporary who is now a professor at New York University. In a Harvard Business School study, published in 1994, Gates spoke of MS’s strategy in terms of network effects and technology standards that, combined, enabled the company to command mkts. NYT NEWS SERVICES